Logo Logo The top.

The banner.  Yeah.

Stay informed, man.

Forums

Fuck Scott Walker

Features

Books

Comics

Film

TV

Music

VG

PC

Nintendo

PS2

XBox

Indie

Tech

Politics

Religion

Red Light District

Conspiracy

Facebook Idiot of the Week

Blog Moron of the Week

YouTube Fuckhead of the Week

Myspace Loser of the Week

Livejournal Moron of the Week

Multimedia

Raiderfeed

FAQ Contact

E-Mail Hate Mail!

Best viewed in 1280x1024

The Daily Raider is brought to you by the Project for an Unamerican Century and the Ronnie Gardocki Beard Preservation Society. The Daily Raider accepts donations, but we will only use them for liquor, cocaine and South American prostitutes.

 

Charlie Sykes' The New Black Codes

by Charlie Sykes

I'm 16/16ths White!

I've been mulling it over a lot lately, it being the status of blacks in our country. For a long time I have championed the reinstitution of slavery. Now I realize the folly of such a practice coming back. We can't do it. Things are too different now as compared to the 1800s. For one, blacks aren't disciplined at all anymore, what with their rap music, their baggy pants and their knowledge of firearms. They just wouldn't make good slaves. Mexicans, maybe. But blacks? No. Too far gone. So I think, instead of enslavement, we simply bring back the famous Black Codes and update them to fit contemporary times. It wouldn't take a lot of work and I would be happy to do it myself. To show this, I did some quick reinterpretations on the fly. Here they are (note: these are not based on the similar Jim Crow laws in most cases; they were too liberal and too pro-nigger for my tastes):

No black people should be allowed in a courtroom - at all. I figure, why should we let the concept of justice and the concept of niggers meet when it's quite obvious they are not at all related. Justice does not involve niggers because blacks are the exact antithesis of justice. They're anti-justice. They deal drugs, they kill people, they rape, they steal. I figure if they commit crimes, we should just throw 'em in jail. No need for trials regarding blacks because we're all aware of their guilt instinctively. Can you really say niggers DON'T commit crimes? Then don't decry racial profiling as 'wrong'. If the skin pigmentation fits, you must lock them up indefinitely. Trials for niggers would just prolong the process when we all really want the process expedited if anything. Guilty until proven white is a wonderful axiom to go by.

No interracial marriage, relationships, friendships or even acquaintanceships. The thing with 'separate but equal' is that it's not really a bad idea if you just strip out the 'equal'. You don't need them to be equal. Separate is good enough for me. See, the thing I don't like about slavery is you have to be around them all day, which increases the chances of them catching jungle bug and going crazy and killing your family. So if you're going to have separate, it has to be truly separate and not just separate in theory. It has to be in practice. Therefore, I don't want to let niggers even TALK to white people. No friendships, no relationships, nothing. The only thing a white can say to a black is "Work harder!" or possibly "I SAID I WANTED MERLOT!!!", and the only thing a black can say to a white is "Yes SAH!". It'd be better for the fabric of our society if we discouraged the races mingling.

No weapons. This one is a given. You don't want niggers to have weapons under any circumstance. I mean, we've seen what happens when we give 'em weapons, and it's truly the one way one can make a case for gun control; that is, gun control applying only to niggers. I think it's obvious crime will go down if blacks aren't allowed weapons, especially guns. We all know whites only use weapons in self-defense, such as when being attacked by or walked past by a nigger. If you take away Donkey Kong's weapons, he'll be unable to defend himself from the cops (his negroid strength can't stop a baton or a bottle of tear gas). See, no weapons almost automatically removes the threat of blacks. I wouldn't have to worry about Michael McGee encroaching on my wife's white womanhood.

Property, but no citizenship rights. I know David Duke doesn't like my idea of property rights, but hear me out for a second. Why shouldn't we give property to blacks, specifically the property they already own? They've already blacked it up so I see no reason why good white people would want land covered in malt liquor bottles, needles and fried chicken on the knob. Let 'em keep it. But, and this is a big but, they don't get citizenship. Thus, their property rights mean nothing. Should we so choose, us whites could demolish their entire infrastructure and they'd have no means of defense because their property rights can't be enforced! It's genius, I tell you. Me and Mark Belling brainstormed the idea last Saturday at the beer hall.

Separate bathrooms, separate water fountains. As I've said before, separate but equal had some good ideas to it. I like the idea of giving separate shit to niggers. Why should they have white things when they're not good enough to deserve said white things? But the most important aspect of this separatism relates to bathrooms and water fountains and other health concerns. I'm okay with taking the same bus as a nigger if they're in the back (hell, their inferior genes already program them to seek the back of the bus), but I am unable to use public facilities knowing there's a possibility of an ape sitting on the toilet just before me. Or an ape smacking his lips all over the water fountain, getting his germs into the water supply. That's why we need separatism - to preserve our white DNA. We certainly don't want it infected with malt liquoritis or some other horrid black disease!

No voting. America is known for its voting rights. We give the vote to everyone. Blacks, Mexicans, the Irish, Italians, Russians, Gooks, faggots, women... I say we're a little too democratic, though. It's already clear a lot of America doesn't stand up for what's white. So let's remove some 'voters' from the equation. Blacks are the obvious first choice, and removing them from the voting pool makes perfect logical sense. We don't give the vote to the mentally retarded, nor do we give it to children. Do we really want Donkey Kong and Diddy Kong down the street deciding who the next president is? They'd probably vote in some thug like Michael McGee or Ludacris, or some monkey suit joker like Barack Obama. I won't stand idly by while that happens. Since blacks have about as much intelligence as children or the retarded1, Congress can justify repealing the 13th Amendment, I'm sure. Then again, if we define blacks as non-citizens, we don't even have to muck up the Amendments (although we should if only on principle).

No ability to own businesses. Just because we want to force minorities into our capitalist economy DOESN'T mean we want them to benefit from our capitalist economy. I mean, it's our economy. We created it, we made it work. Why should fucking gorillas get to reap the hard work WE did? Therefore, I don't think we ought to let them own their own businesses. Can you imagine what it'd be like if blacks actually prospered by working within the system? Why, we could see the creation of the banana or watermelon aristocracy right before our very eyes. I don't want to work on some plantation in Big Ape City (Detroit). I'm white! Blacks should have to work for me, or not work at all so they can just die in the streets of the ghetto. This Black Code worked in the South pre-Civil War. I don't see how it wouldn't work today in Wisconsin.

"Three's a crowd" rule. With separating blacks and whites there's always the worry of blacks joining together and creating some sort of orangutan resistance or something. Hence why this is a key part of the Black Codes. "Three's a crowd" has been used with great success in Rudy Giuliani's New York. Basically, if there are three or more black homies 'hanging out', they're to be arrested under this law. This'll take tons of troublemakers, potential troublemakers and black enough to look suspicious enough to be troublemakers off the streets, thus making Milwaukee much, much safer. We NEED this law, Milwaukee. If the nigger problem is solved to satisfaction, we can finally concentrate on pressing issues such as Mayor Barrett's Jewish finance schemes or Russ Feingold setting up a Jew mafia before our very eyes through his senajeworial power. Not to mention we'll have time to beat down more immigrants and assert the dominance of the English language!

I have to admit, after thinking up all of these new black codes, I'm beginning to believe separate but equal was underrated. That way we Americans get some evidence to show to the other nations that we're not racist while not actually having to do anything to give these niggers equality. There's definitely precedent for it in American history that shows we can go back to it. The black codes got reinstated during radical jewconstruction in the South on a state-by-state basis. If someone like Ron Paul wins (I may not agree with his Iraqi-killing non-policy, I do agree with his minority-Americans killing policy), I think he'll not only rip out the Jewish infrastructure but he'll also give our states the rights to enact the black codes again. Yep, the future's so bright for the white race I have to wear my special white-tinted sunglasses. Haha, you fuckers may own BET now, but not for long, niggers! You'll be back to being the second-class non-citizens you deserve to be! Ha ha ha ha ha!

Footnotes

1. "Blacks Found To Lack Even Basic Intelligence", David Duke Journal of Phrenology, June 2005, pg. 34-37.